{"id":5891,"date":"2020-07-21T10:09:17","date_gmt":"2020-07-21T08:09:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pmr-restrukturyzacje.local\/pmr\/nowe-zasady-restrukturyzacji-kto-zyska-a-kto-straci\/"},"modified":"2020-07-21T10:09:17","modified_gmt":"2020-07-21T08:09:17","slug":"new-restructuring-rules-who-will-gain-and-who-will-lose","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pmrsa.pl\/en\/new-restructuring-rules-who-will-gain-and-who-will-lose\/","title":{"rendered":"New restructuring rules - who will gain and who will lose?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Thanks to the simplified restructuring procedure, debtors get four months to reach an agreement with their creditors. Whether the solutions adopted together with the anti-crisis shield will help companies survive the difficult period was discussed by the guests of the DGP<\/p>\n

Under Shield 4.0, simplified restructuring proceedings have been introduced. The provisions came into force on 24 June 2020. But why were they introduced at all as part of the coronavirus special law?<\/p>\n

Ma\u0142gorzata Anisimowicz:
\nThe chosen direction is the right one. It is obvious that the importance of the courts cannot be overestimated, but it is also clear to me that the possibilities of the courts must be managed wisely \u2013 strictly organizational, technical ones. Therefore, adopting the solution that the opening simplified restructuring proceedings<\/a> Doesn't require judicial approval, I like it.
\nThe current economic situation means that entrepreneurs are struggling with trying to answer the question of whether this is the right time to adjust the company's resources to market expectations. However, time was and is one of the most important elements \u2012 in order to maintain the company<\/a>, jobs, satisfaction of creditors. <\/i><\/p>\n

When the work on the act was in its final stages, the Entrepreneurship Council, which includes most of the large business organizations, strongly protested against the simplified restructuring procedure. It argued in its appeal that the new regulations would excessively strengthen the position of debtors at the expense of creditors<\/a>. Have you ever wondered why the entrepreneurs changed their minds during the work \u2013 first they praised, then they criticized?<\/p>\n

Ma\u0142gorzata Anisimowicz:
\nThe position of the entrepreneurs who protested against the simplified restructuring procedure seems to me to be over the top. First of all, it is worth looking at the legislation and answering the question of what would hit creditors' rights so hard. In the worst-case scenario for the creditor, the debtor will benefit from a four-month period during which no enforcement and no termination of contracts can be carried out against him and he will not seek an arrangement. Let me remind you: four months. Assuming there is no simplified procedure, what can a creditor do in that time? There is no chance that he will enforce the claim in the course of bailiff enforcement. The court? Proceedings take two to three years. So really, even in cases of abuse of the procedure by the debtor, the worst that can happen to the creditor is a loss of four months. So, in my opinion, the profit and loss account is clear: the simplified procedure is needed and the disadvantage of the new rules for creditors is quite illusory.<\/i><\/p>\n

The article appeared in Dziennik Gazeta Prawna<\/b>:on 21 July 2020. We invite you to read the full version:\" New restructuring rules - who will gain and who will lose?<\/a><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dzi\u0119ki uproszczonemu post\u0119powaniu restrukturyzacyjnemu d\u0142u\u017cnicy dostaj\u0105 cztery miesi\u0105ce na porozumienie si\u0119 z wierzycielami. O tym, czy przyj\u0119te wraz z tarcz\u0105 antykryzysow\u0105 rozwi\u0105zania pomog\u0105 firmom przetrwa\u0107 trudny okres, dyskutowali go\u015bcie DGP Na mocy tarczy 4.0 wprowadzono uproszczone post\u0119powanie restrukturyzacyjne. Przepisy wesz\u0142y w \u017cycie 24 czerwca 2020 r. Ale po co w og\u00f3le by\u0142o je wprowadza\u0107 w ramach specustawy koronawirusowej? Ma\u0142gorzata Anisimowicz: Obrany kierunek jest w\u0142a\u015bciwy. Oczywiste jest to, \u017ce znaczenie s\u0105d\u00f3w jest nie do przecenienia, ale jasne dla mnie r\u00f3wnie\u017c jest to, \u017ce trzeba rozs\u0105dnie gospodarowa\u0107 mo\u017cliwo\u015bciami s\u0105d\u00f3w \u2012 tymi stricte organizacyjnymi, technicznymi. Dlatego przyj\u0119cie rozwi\u0105zania, \u017ce otwarcie uproszczonego post\u0119powania restrukturyzacyjnego nie wymaga s\u0105dowej aprobaty, podoba mi si\u0119. Obecna sytuacja gospodarcza powoduje, \u017ce przedsi\u0119biorcy borykaj\u0105 si\u0119 z pr\u00f3b\u0105 odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy jest to ten moment, aby dostosowa\u0107 zasoby firmy do oczekiwa\u0144 rynku. Natomiast to czas by\u0142 i jest jednym z najwa\u017cniejszych element\u00f3w \u2012 celem zachowania firmy, miejsc pracy, zaspokojenia wierzycieli. Gdy prace nad ustaw\u0105 by\u0142y na ostatniej prostej, stanowczo przeciwko uproszczonemu post\u0119powaniu restrukturyzacyjnemu zaprotestowa\u0142a Rada Przedsi\u0119biorczo\u015bci, w sk\u0142ad kt\u00f3rej wchodzi wi\u0119kszo\u015b\u0107 du\u017cych organizacji biznesu. Przekonywa\u0142a ona w swym apelu, \u017ce nowe przepisy zbytnio wzmocni\u0105 pozycj\u0119 d\u0142u\u017cnik\u00f3w kosztem wierzycieli. Czy zastanawiali si\u0119 pa\u0144stwo, dlaczego w toku prac przedsi\u0119biorcy zmienili zdanie \u2012 najpierw chwalili, by potem gani\u0107? Ma\u0142gorzata Anisimowicz: Stanowisko przedsi\u0119biorc\u00f3w, kt\u00f3rzy zaprotestowali przeciwko uproszczonemu post\u0119powaniu restrukturyzacyjnemu, wydaje mi si\u0119 na wyrost. Przede wszystkim warto spojrze\u0107 w przepisy i odpowiedzie\u0107 sobie na pytanie, co mia\u0142oby tak uderza\u0107 w prawa wierzycieli. W najgorszym dla wierzyciela razie d\u0142u\u017cnik skorzysta z czteromiesi\u0119cznego okresu, w kt\u00f3rym nie b\u0119dzie mo\u017cna prowadzi\u0107 wobec niego egzekucji oraz wypowiada\u0107 mu um\u00f3w, i nie b\u0119dzie d\u0105\u017cy\u0142 do zawarcia uk\u0142adu. Przypominam: cztery miesi\u0105ce. Zak\u0142adaj\u0105c, \u017ce uproszczonego post\u0119powania nie ma, co w takim czasie mo\u017ce zrobi\u0107 wierzyciel? Nie ma szans, by wyegzekwowa\u0142 wierzytelno\u015b\u0107 w toku egzekucji komorniczej. S\u0105d? Post\u0119powania trwaj\u0105 dwa\u2012trzy lata. A zatem naprawd\u0119 nawet w przypadkach nadu\u017cywania procedury przez d\u0142u\u017cnika najgorsze, co mo\u017ce spotka\u0107 wierzyciela, to strata czterech miesi\u0119cy. Moim zdaniem wi\u0119c rachunek zysk\u00f3w i strat jest oczywisty: uproszczone post\u0119powanie jest potrzebne, a pokrzywdzenie nowymi przepisami wierzycieli do\u015b\u0107 iluzoryczne. Artyku\u0142 ukaza\u0142 si\u0119 w Dzienniku Gazeta Prawna:dnia 21 lipca 2020 r. Zapraszamy do zapoznania si\u0119 z jego pe\u0142n\u0105 wersj\u0105:\u00bb Nowe zasady restrukturyzacji \u2013 kto zyska, a kto straci?<\/p>","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[30],"class_list":["post-5891","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog"],"authors":[{"term_id":30,"user_id":12,"is_guest":0,"slug":"teampmr-restructuring-pl","display_name":"Zesp\u00f3\u0142 PMR","avatar_url":{"url":"https:\/\/pmrsa.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/logo2-e1729926426335.png","url2x":"https:\/\/pmrsa.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/logo2-e1729926426335.png"},"0":null,"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pmrsa.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5891","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pmrsa.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pmrsa.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pmrsa.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pmrsa.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5891"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/pmrsa.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5891\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pmrsa.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5891"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pmrsa.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5891"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pmrsa.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5891"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pmrsa.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=5891"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}