If you want to understand in 30 seconds what the planned consumer bankruptcy reform is about, below are the most important facts.
- The Ministry of Justice has published a draft amendment to the Act Bankruptcy law.
- The aim of the reform is to simplify procedures and relieve the courts.
- The bill assumes, among other things, automatic cancellation of remaining liabilities after the repayment plan is completed, limitation of debtors' obligations, and changes in the remuneration of trustees.
- A final assessment of the reform will only be possible after the bill is passed, when the final wording of the regulations is known.
- Legal status: draft bill – provisions not in force.
A few words about the article - Listen
In this article we explain what changes the Ministry of Justice is planning to make to consumer bankruptcy:
The Ministry of Justice presented a draft amendment to the Act – Bankruptcy law and certain other acts, which assume significant changes in the functioning consumer bankruptcy. The bill was published in the official legislative agenda of the Council of Ministers and is a response to the dynamic increase in the number of bankruptcy proceedings and the increasing workload of bankruptcy divisions of common courts.
According to the information provided by the ministry, the aim of the planned reform is simplification of procedures, reducing excessive bureaucracy and accelerating the process of debt relief for individuals, while improving the work of courts and participants in the proceedings.

CONTENTS:
The most important proposed changes:
Automatic debt write-off
The project provides that after the execution of the creditor repayment plan the cancellation of the remaining liabilities will take place automatically, unless the creditors object within a specified period. This solution is intended to limit the number of additional incidental proceedings and shorten the waiting time for the case to be finally concluded.
What does this mean:
Automatic discontinuation is a mechanism in which, after the debtor has fulfilled his obligations, the court does not issue an additional ruling – discontinuation occurs by operation of law, unless the objection is found to be justified.

Elimination of the obligation to submit annual reports
One of the most important changes is abolition of the obligation for debtors to submit annual reports on the implementation of the repayment plan. In practice, this obligation often constituted a formal barrier and led to procedural complications, especially for people with limited organizational or digital capabilities.
Reducing bureaucracy in the courts
The project assumes shifting some purely administrative activities – such as event registration or technical activities – to court secretariat employees, which is intended to enable judges to concentrate on resolving substantive issues.
Changes in the principles of remuneration of trustees
In consumer bankruptcies it is planned unification trustee's remuneration, generally up to one average monthly salary. The purpose of this solution is to increase the predictability of procedural costs and reduce the risk of artificially prolonging cases.

Limitation of appeals
The project envisages liquidation of the cassation appeal to the Supreme Court in matters concerning repayment plans. This is intended to speed up the finalization of proceedings, although it also raises doubts regarding the scope of procedural protection for the parties.
Why is the legislator proposing changes?
According to ministry data, the number of consumer bankruptcies is steadily increasing, and bankruptcy courts are overloaded with activities that, in many cases, do not require strictly legal decisions. The proposed reform is intended to lead to a more efficient, more automated model debt relief, which will shorten the duration of the proceedings and reduce their costs.
Potential benefits for debtors
- faster ending bankruptcy proceedings,
- reducing formalities and administrative obligations,
- fewer court proceedings,
- greater predictability of the final debt relief moment,
- a real possibility of closing the debt stage and returning to normal financial functioning.
Risks and controversies
The planned simplifications are not without risks. Limiting appeals may lead to reducing the procedural protection of both debtors and creditors, especially in more complex cases.
The uniform remuneration of the trustee raises questions about the effectiveness of handling cases that require more work. The practical operation of the mechanism for creditors to object to automatic bankruptcy also raises doubts. debt write-offs and the potential increase in disputes in this regard.

Description: Mediation in a dispute instead of tug-of-war. Click to learn how.
What the changes mean in practice
The reform may be particularly beneficial for people:
- having a simple debt structure,
- no disputes as to the existence or amount of the claim,
- interested in a quick and formally simplified conclusion of the proceedings.
On the other hand, debtors with a more complicated situation – many creditors, material security or disputed receivables – should consider whether the simplified procedure will not limit their ability to defend their interests.
Expert commentary
From the perspective of bankruptcy practice, the announced directions of changes should be assessed with cautious optimism. The drafters' intention is to simplify procedures and shorten the duration of proceedings, which is expected to bring real benefits to both debtors and the courts, as well as the restructuring advisor acting as the trustee. At the same time, at this stage, we are primarily dealing with design assumptions, and not yet with the final shape of the regulations.
Only a detailed analysis of the adopted law—including the wording of individual regulations, their application procedures, and control mechanisms—will allow us to assess whether the announced simplifications will actually translate into improved quality of bankruptcy proceedings. In practice, how the new solutions are interpreted by courts and applied by debtors' trustees and creditors will also be crucial.
At this stage, it becomes particularly important conscious preparation for bankruptcy proceedings and choosing the right strategy before submitting the application, because in a more automated model the possibilities of correcting errors at a later stage may be limited.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
1. Are the changes to consumer bankruptcy already in force?
No. As of the date of preparation of this article, it is bill, which has not yet entered into force.
2. When can the new regulations come into force?
The Act will enter into force only after it is passed by Parliament and signed by the President.
3. Will automatic debt relief apply to every debtor?
In principle, yes, but the mechanism objection by creditors may turn off automatism in individual cases.
4. Is limiting appeals beneficial?
It speeds up proceedings, but may limit the possibility of challenging erroneous decisions.

Summary
The planned consumer bankruptcy reform is an attempt to address real systemic problems, such as court overload and excessive formalization of proceedings. The announced directions of change – including the automation of some activities and the reduction of administrative obligations – may improve the future. debt relief process.
Simultaneously a real assessment of the quality of these solutions will only be possible after the adoption of the Act and after the first experiences with its application in practice. The final shape of the regulations will determine whether the reform will actually bring simplifications without unduly limiting the legal protection of participants in the proceedings.
Until the new regulations enter into force, both debtors and creditors should closely monitor the legislative process and make decisions based on the currently applicable regulations, taking into account possible directions of changes.
The official draft bill is available on the government website:
https://www.gov.pl/web/premier/projekt-ustawy-o-zmianie-ustawy–prawo-upadlosciowe-oraz-niektorych-innych-ustaw













